By: Eric Walbridge
There have been several advances in criminal monitoring that are put in to use by a country’s federal government. Due to the advancement of technology and the use of the internet, new developments are emerging as a way of monitoring and tracking criminals. In a recent article published by the New York Times, the use of Internet spyware by federal governments has overreached the initial purpose of the monitoring technology. A British technology company called Gamma Group was documented selling their spyware called FinSpy to at least twenty-five different federal governments around the world. The Gamma Group was quoted in the article stating that their software is “solely for criminal investigations”. The problem with this is that governments that have a long history of human rights violations, such as Ethiopia and Serbia, are utilizing this spyware. Researchers at the University of Toronto’s school of Global Affairs and the University of California Berkeley have found that FinSpy can literally “grab images off your computer, record Skype chats, and turn on cameras and microphones”. This technology is being used by government officials to monitor political behavior rather than criminal behavior. As seen in Ethiopia, FinSpy is disguised as an email and sent to suspected anti-government citizens. Once the email is opened, the spyware is able to monitor all activity on the person’s computer.
The original design for this spyware was not to monitor citizen’s behavior, but rather to track criminals and potential crimes. But government officials seem to be extending this technology to gain a political advantage and also to invade the privacy of its citizens. This technology is extremely difficult to detect and nearly impossible to shut down completely. Researchers urge citizens of these counties to be mindful of the growing use of these types of spyware technologies and to speak out against the violations of privacy that are being implemented by their federal government. The use of FinSpy could definitely be used to prevent crime and investigate criminal behavior, but at the expense of the privacy of citizens. The growing use of technology in crime prevention can be a cover for a wide variety of uses that extend far beyond its original design. It is up to the citizens of these countries, included our own United States, to speak out against these egregious privacy violations.
This is a very scary technology, specially because it seams to me it is very easy for government to police criminal activity. However, what if the criminals were the ones using this type of technology for blackmail, identity theft and other cyber related crimes? I think that progress is awesome but when we have to constantly worry about invasions of privacy the price of progress becomes too expensive. :)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the previous comment that this is especially scary when used by the criminals. We already know that government uses new technology to facilitate crime prevention and that it affects our privacy. It is ingrained in our society and I think as new technology emerges, it will only get more intrusive. I personally think that if this practice helps to apprehend criminals, than it should be used. But as was discussed in class, whatever technology law enforcement agencies get, the bad guys can also obtain, and that is where it becomes a problem.
ReplyDeleteGreat post Eric! It seems that this new form of technology does indeed serve a good purpose to help with crime and investigate criminal behavior, but citizens are loosing their right to privacy. These new spyware technology devices have the power to capture any image and see anything even if it suppose to be for the purpose of criminal surveillance. I like that there is new technology to help catch criminals, but I'm not sure if I like giving up my privacy in exchange.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with the previous comments. I think there should be a concern and a clear line of what the government can or more specifically cannot do. Although, there is a legislative lag and when they try to legislate they create extreme legislation limiting everybody's freedom, because the tactics the government would be self interest fulfilling which is very conflicting to the interest of the people. So, if it was solely based upon catching bad guys or letting good guys go then of course everybody would side with the prior, but the fact that when new technology is created and there is no taking the step backwards as described in article this becomes the driving force that requires protection.
ReplyDelete